Showing posts with label Fannie Mae. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fannie Mae. Show all posts

Friday, May 29, 2009

Taxpayers are getting less back than promised from economic bailout, with inadequate transparency with the program

WASHINGTON - DECEMBER 9:  (L-R) Former Freddie...Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Government reform orgs. deliver news on major events within their areas of expertise.
From:
TCS- Taxpayers for Common Sense

Volume XIV No. 22: May 29, 2009
Picture: Former CEOs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before Congress.


Cha-Ching! That’s the sound you’ve heard over the last several months as about 600 companies walked away from the federal cash register, their pockets stuffed with wads of cash. We’ve never been too thrilled with how the economic bailout has been implemented, but now, eight months in, more problems are emerging. Taxpayers are getting less back than promised, transparency has barely increased and the program seems to be turning into a revolving loan fund without Congressional scrutiny.

Since the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was created in the fall, about $600 billion has been committed to supporting the financial sector, leaving about $100 billion to go. Throw in the money promised to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the price tag hits $1.1 trillion. And we’re not even counting the Fed’s commitment to shore up financial institutions.

Most of the TARP money is going to banks through the Capital Purchase Program (CPP), under which banks receive money in exchange for preferred stock, theoretically enabling them to maintain or increase lending.

As more and more eyes scrutinize the way the bailout dollars are being used, many concerns arise. First, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that Treasury paid $356 billion more to banks than the value of assets received in exchange – a 51% subsidy rate.

Treasury recently completed a series of “stress tests” on 19 of the country’s largest banks to determine whether TARP was indeed helping them avoiding shutting down. While Treasury’s view of the test results was optimistic, the banks could lose $599 billion by the end of 2010 under the worst case scenario. Also, Treasury is requiring 10 of the banks to raise billions in additional capital to shore up their balance sheets. But by requiring banks to bolster their capital cushions, some banks may reduce lending – the opposite of the Bailout’s goal. And for those banks unable to meet the capital goals, Uncle Sam may become their owner.

Other banks are considering getting out of the TARP game altogether, and some have already bought back their stock and warrants. Initially the public was led to believe that we might actually profit from TARP investments after the economic dust settled. But it looks like Treasury is content with taxpayers swallowing all of that $356 billion overpayment. Warrants that were part of most of the TARP deals represent the Treasury’s potential for profit. A warrant holder has the right to purchase a company’s stock, and can thus profit in the future if that stock is sold at a higher price. In one recent example Old National Bancorp bought back all of its preferred stock from Treasury and negotiated a $1.2 million buyback of its warrants. But a separate analysis put the potential value of those warrants at $6.9 million.

We agree that Treasury shouldn’t be in the business of playing the stock market. But allowing other private investors to bid on the warrants would result in a fairer valuation without increasing risks to taxpayers.

Treasury Secretary Geithner now wants to recycle the returned cash and give it to banks that are not yet participating in the program – TARP II. Sequels are rarely better. We’ve argued for months that one of the biggest problems with the first bailout was the failure of Congress and Treasury to lay out clear, measurable goals. Before recycling the dough, Congress should force Treasury to come back to the table and tell taxpayers just how we are benefitting from the money already doled out and explain TARP’s effectiveness in shoring up the economy. We can’t afford a rerun of the same mistakes.


>All Things Reform Mobile: allthingsreform.mofuse.mobi >Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121 (not toll-free) >US House/Senate Mobile: bit.ly/members >Contact your reps tips: bit.ly/dear >Shortened All Things Reform URL: bit.ly/dw


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Stay up-to-date on the federal bailouts from ProPublica

The U.S. Treasury building, Washington D.C.The U.S. Treasury building, Washington, DC USA. Image via Wikipedia

Government reform orgs. deliver news on major events within their areas of expertise.
From:
ProPublica


Where do these numbers come from?

Our lists of
recipients and programs deal only with expenditures by the Treasury Department – in other words, taxpayer money. We've included all such money allocated by Congress, both the broader $700 billion TARP bill and the separate $400 billion bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: a total of $1.1 trillion.

But the Treasury hasn't been working alone – it's been putting up big money alongside the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Our entries for individual financial institutions and programs indicate when the Treasury has committed funds in conjunction with the Fed and/or FDIC, but for a complete accounting of
the Fed's and FDIC's spending so far, see Subsidyscope.

Most of the data shown in our project comes from the Treasury Department. But in a few cases, we've gathered information from other government agencies or press releases and regulatory filings from bailout recipients.

If you've got more questions about how we do this,
please drop us a line.

What You Can Do Here:
Steal Our Data

All of the data in this section is available for download – and you're free to reuse it so long as you give ProPublica credit, don't change any data, and don't sell it for money. (We're licensed under Creative Commons,
which provides the legal details.)

You can download the data using the XML and CSV download links on all pages with tables. If there's sufficient interest we'll do a programmer's API.
E-mail us if you're interested in the API and to let us know how you're using the data.

>All Things Reform Mobile: allthingsreform.mofuse.mobi >Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121 (not toll-free) >US House/Senate Mobile: bit.ly/members >Contact your reps tips: bit.ly/dear >Shortened All Things Reform URL: bit.ly/dw

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Improper mortgage deals from Countrywide benefited congressmembers


Christopher Dodd, U.S. Senator.US Senator Chris Dodd. Image via Wikipedia

Government reform orgs. deliver news on major events within their areas of expertise.
From:
Docuticker

Source: U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (GOP)


An Oversight and Government Reform Committee Republican report Countrywide Financial Corporation’s infamous VIP and Friends of Angelo Program offers new insight into the inner workings of Countrywide’s efforts to buy friends in critical government and industry positions affecting the company’s business interests.

“This investigation finds that Countrywide embarked in a determined and calculated effort to buy influence – employees openly weighed the political influence of targeted officials when deciding what perks to offer,” said Issa. “Countrywide VIPs in positions of key responsibility didn’t innocently stumble into loans with reduced rates and waived fees – they were recruited into the program personally by high-ranking company officials including former CEO Angelo Mozilo.”

“VIPs weren’t just offered good service. Company policies were thrown in the trash in a rush to offer preferential treatment to VIPs such as Senator Kent Conrad and Senator Chris Dodd. Those who were supposed to oversee the lending practices and relationship between Countrywide and Fannie Mae were actually in bed with them.”

“I have asked Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Edolphus Towns to join me in requesting all Countrywide VIP and lobbying documents from Bank of America so that the full extent of this influence buying operation program can be investigated. Despite our work, questions remain about the ‘Friends of Angelo’ program and the identities of others who likely received improper benefits.”

+ Full Report (PDF; 1 MB)


>All Things Reform Mobile: allthingsreform.mofuse.mobi >Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121 (not toll-free) >US House/Senate Mobile: bit.ly/members >Contact your reps tips: bit.ly/dear >Shortened All Things Reform URL: bit.ly/dw


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac expose the corruption culture in Washington, DC


Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: That went wellImage by qthrul via Flickr
Government reform orgs. deliver news on major events within their areas of expertise.

From: Judicial Watch

Fannie and Freddie Expose the Corruption Culture in Washington

The federal government announced earlier this week that it has seized control of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a $200 billion corporate bailout, the largest in the nation's history. The shock waves are being felt not only in the financial markets, but also inside the Beltway as the two companies face allegations of corruption and cronyism. The whole bailout (and other federal actions) seems very socialist and dirigiste to me. But I'll leave the free market to critique our economic conservative friends. The one thing that is certain is that the collapse was avoidable, but oversight was lax because of the casual culture of corruption that pervades this city.

Overall, Fannie and Freddie have spent more than $180 million over the last 10 years to lobby their friends in Congress, making sure that nothing happened in Washington they didn't want to happen. According to Politico.com, "The two government-chartered companies run a highly sophisticated lobbying operation, with deep-pocketed lobbyists in Washington and scores of local Fannie- and Freddie-sponsored homeowner groups ready to pressure lawmakers back home." (Fannie Mae was also nabbed in an all-too-familiar accounting scheme where the company's profits were overstated so that top executives could reap huge cash bonuses.)

Of course, with the bailout, that has all changed -- for now anyway.

The tentacles of the Fannie and Freddie debacle reach deep into Washington and both political parties. Again, from Politico.com:

Franklin D. Raines, a former budget director in the Clinton White House, was paid $90 million in the five years he served as Fannie's CEO. He resigned amid an accounting scandal in 2004 with a $19 million severance package, though it was later whittled down after court challenges.

Former Clinton FBI Director Louis Freeh sits on Fannie's board today. Bush White House veteran Stephen Friedman was once a board member, and former Bush trade representative and State Department official Robert Zoellick did a tour as a Fannie executive vice president.

Freddie's foundation has its own list of heavy hitters. Among its former board members are Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), a confidant of Democratic nominee Barack Obama, and Harold Ickes, a senior adviser to both President Clinton and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.). From the Republican side, David Gribbin, an aide to Vice President Cheney, once sat on the board, and Robert Glauber, a former Treasury undersecretary, is on the board.

Another so-called "confidant" of Barack Obama, by the way, was none other than James Johnson, the former Fannie Mae CEO who was forced to resign from Obama's Vice Presidential vetting committee after the press reported Johnson had received preferable mortgage interest terms. (Johnson was also linked to shady fundraising practices when he was the head of the company.)

(And don't worry, the mortgage expert Charlie Rangel will continue to help oversee the mortgage companies in Congress.)

The fact is big government leads to more corruption. And it doesn't get much bigger than Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which dominated the $12 trillion home loan market, especially now that the federal government is running the whole show. The companies took care of both political parties, took more risks with the urging of their allies in Congress, and taxpayers are left holding the bag.

Arguably, this is the biggest government corruption scandal in our nation's history. But because "everyone" in Washington is involved, you won't hear a peep about it from our nation's Establishment.

Judicial Watch, on the other hand, has more than a few leads to investigate and I'll keep you informed as to what we find.

.
>All Things Reform Mobile: allthingsreform.mofuse.mobi >Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121 (not toll-free) >US House/Senate Mobile: bit.ly/members >Contact your reps tips: bit.ly/dear
.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may receive from Congress more than financial help


We periodically receive newsletters from a wide variety of government reform news sources. These focus on only the major events within their respective areas of expertise. Here is a selection from a recent email newsletter:
From Taxpayers for Common Sense
http://bit.ly/Pohc4

Fannie and Freddie should downsize and be overseen by the Federal Reserve

[...] No matter what happens [to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac financial troubles] – even if a bailout is avoided – strong strings must be attached [by Congress]. Fannie and Freddie are going to have to shrink and they are going to have to be overseen by the Federal Reserve. In writing the bailout package, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee said that he was “determined to do this early but more determined to go it right.” We sure hope so.
.

---
> All Things Reform Mobile: allthingsreform.mofuse.mobi
> Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121 (not toll-free)
> US House/ US Senate Mobile: bit.ly/members
> Contact your representative tips: bit.ly/dear
---
.