WE CAN'T POST ANYMORE DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES; SEE OUR LATEST POSTS AT "ACTIVISM TODAY" AT http://allthingsreform.org.
Friday, February 29, 2008
Tell your US Senators to vote FOR Consumer Product Safety Reform Act of 2007
Although the Consumer Product Safety Reform Act of 2007 (S. 2663) will give the CPSC much-needed muscle, it could be stronger than it is. For example, the maximum fine for violating the Act has been reduced from $100 million to $10 million, or $20 million in "aggravated" circumstances, a pittance for multibillion-dollar corporations. However, the current bill makes valuable improvements over current law that must be defended.
TAKE ACTION: Urge your senators to vote FOR the Consumer Product Safety bill and strong, consumer-friendly amendments and AGAINST amendments that put industry interests before consumers! Thank you
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Consumer Product Safety Commission unresponsive to dangerous and defective company product reports
Here is Public Citizen's description of its newest report on consumer product safety issues and the federal government:
U.S. Consumer Protection Officials Wait Months to Notify Public of Dangerous, Defective Products, Public Citizen Study FindsDespite a law requiring manufacturers to provide the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) with “immediate” notification of dangerous products, the agency typically delays nearly seven months after learning of dangerous, defective products before telling the public. A new Public Citizen study, Hazardous Waits: CPSC Lets Crucial Time Pass Before Warning Public About Dangerous Products, reveals that companies fined for tardy reporting took an average of 993 days – 2.7 years – between learning of a safety defect in their products and notifying the CPSC. Perhaps as shocking, the CPSC then took an average of 209 additional days before disclosing the information to the public – even though each case concerned a product defect so dangerous that the item was recalled.
Read the press release Read the report Read a summary of the differences between the House and Senate versions of the Consumer Product Safety Reform/Modernization Act Read an in-depth comparison of the House and Senate bill
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Encourage good business and dismantle the CPSC federal agency!
Why would our Chief Executive Officer choose someone who hates to notify the public about even minor safety concerns? I graduated with a degree in management, and I can tell you it's not good business to harm your customers-- if your product is defective, you should immediately notify it's owners, apologize profusely for the carelessness, and offer a replacement free of charge. We shouldn't have a CPSC anyway, because a company is fully responsible for the products/services it provides.